Analysing the “trade of the year” and its implications for financial markets

Introduction

In today’s complex financial landscape, understanding the interplay between regulatory changes and market dynamics is crucial for navigating investment opportunities. At SecFin Solutions, we pride ourselves on translating intricate market movements into actionable insights for our clients. A perfect example is currently unfolding in the US rates market, where a particular trade has captured the attention of macro hedge funds and earned the moniker “trade of the year.”

The SLR Trade Explained

Hedge funds have been positioning themselves for a significant move in US swap spreads – the difference between Treasury yields and interest rate swap rates. These spreads have been persistently negative for years, but recent comments from Federal Reserve officials about potentially easing the Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) requirements for Treasury holdings have sparked a flurry of activity.

The core strategy involves:

• Going long on US Treasuries
• Simultaneously paying fixed on interest rate swaps
• Betting that the negative basis between these instruments will move closer to zero

As our risk advisory team at SecFin Solutions has observed, this trade reflects a rare opportunity in an otherwise uncertain rates environment, where direction remains clouded by questions about inflation, growth, and the Trump administration’s fiscal policies.

Why Is This Happening Now?

The SLR, introduced as part of Basel III regulations, requires banks to hold capital against balance sheet exposures without risk-weighting. US regulators gold-plated these requirements for large American banks:

• Base SLR requirement: 3%
• Additional buffer for large US banks: 2%
• Requirement for insured depository subsidiaries of G-SIBs: 6%

These stringent requirements have constrained banks’ appetite for balance sheet-intensive activities involving Treasuries, particularly in the repo market. The resulting scarcity of bank balance sheet capacity has pushed investors toward interest rate swaps for fixed-rate exposures, driving swap rates below Treasury rates and creating the negative swap spread.

At SecFin Solutions, we’ve been tracking this regulatory friction point, helping our clients navigate the resulting market distortions.

The Regulatory Catalyst

Recent statements from key Federal Reserve officials have energised this trade:

Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman emphasised on February 5th: “Where we can take proactive regulatory measures to ensure that primary dealers have adequate balance sheet capacity to intermediate Treasury markets, we should do so.”

Fed Chair Jerome Powell reinforced this position on February 12th: “We need to work on Treasury market structure, and part of that answer can be, and I think will be, reducing the calibration of the supplemental leverage ratio.”

These comments triggered an immediate market response, with the 10-year swap spread moving from -45.6bp to -37.7bp within just over a week.

Market Implementation and Positioning

Our trading analytics team at SecFin Solutions has noted that funds are implementing this strategy in several ways:

• Using Treasury futures instead of bonds to gain leveraged exposure to the basis
• Unwinding short futures positions from existing Treasuries-versus-futures basis trades
• Focusing primarily on shorter tenors, where the impact of regulatory changes would be most cleanly expressed

This shift in positioning is evident in CFTC commitment of traders’ reports, which showed leveraged funds reducing their short open interest in 10-year Treasury futures by more than 10% over a three-week period in February.

Potential Market Impact

Goldman Sachs estimates that regulatory reform could free up approximately £180 billion of excess capital for banks, expanding capacity in repo and Treasury markets by 20%. This could drive further movement in swap spreads across the curve.

Despite an initial 8bp move, 10-year swap spreads have partially retraced, suggesting significant potential remains in this trade. However, as our market strategists at SecFin Solutions continually emphasise to clients, timing is crucial – the implementation of regulatory changes may take several quarters, making the path of swap spreads potentially non-linear.

SecFin Solutions’ Perspective

At SecFin Solutions, we specialise in helping clients navigate these complex regulatory-driven market opportunities. Our approach involves:

1. Regulatory Impact Analysis: Assessing how changes in capital requirements translate to pricing and market structure shifts
2. Timing Optimisation: Developing frameworks to determine optimal entry and exit points for regulatory-driven trades
3. Risk Calibration: Ensuring exposure sizing accounts for potential implementation delays and policy uncertainties

For asset managers seeking to capitalise on similar market inefficiencies, our consulting services provide the analytical foundation to execute with confidence and precision.

Conclusion

The SLR trade represents a fascinating case study in how regulatory changes can create specific trading opportunities in rates markets. While the initial move has already occurred, the journey towards normalised swap spreads may continue for months, creating ongoing tactical opportunities.

At SecFin Solutions, we continue to monitor this and other regulatory-driven market dislocations, providing our clients with timely insights and strategic guidance to navigate an increasingly complex financial landscape.

For further analysis see article by Lukas Becker at Risk.Net

This analysis is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. For personalised consulting on regulatory-driven market opportunities, contact the SecFin Solutions team.

© SecFin Solutions, 2025